Real Estate Information Archive

Blog

Displaying blog entries 31-34 of 34

Is This The New Norm?

by Don Roth

We've gone down the higher-inflation, higher-interest rate road many times in the past, only to find ourselves doubling back. There is an interesting trend occurring with banks, though, that could persuade us to go down it once again.

One of the more vocal criticisms of banks is that they haven't been lending as much as they should. There is some validity to the criticism; banks have been squirreling away a higher amount of reserves with the Federal Reserve, which has attenuated loan supply and, therefore, money supply, thus keeping inflation in check.

Data released by the Federal Reserve show this period of containment appears to be ending. In other words, excess bank reserves are leaking into the economy and money supply is growing. Because we operate in a fraction-reserve banking system, which means one dollar can be sufficiently leveraged to produce nine more, more reserves put to work can quickly raise inflation pressure.

This all might seem abstruse to the layperson unfamiliar with the intricacies of the Federal Reserve and fractional-reserving banking. All we are saying is that it is folly to write off price inflation and the possibility of higher mortgage rates, because there is no “normal” when it comes to financial markets.

Information courtesy of Jessica Regan.

July 2011 New Home Sales Report

by Don Roth

The woes of homebuilders and anyone dependent on home building continue. The July report on new home sales shows that the annual sales rate has fallen to 298,000 units, hitting a five-month low. The good news is that supply isn't expanding. In fact, only 165,000 homes are in inventory. This is a record low and a 6.6-month supply at the going sales pace.

Homebuilders face a cluster of problems: bargain-priced foreclosures; higher lending standards; and skittish buyers, many of whom have been further put off by the recent stock market sell-off. Mounting concerns of a double-dip recession and rising cancellation rates have only exacerbated homebuilder worries. The chief concern now is that builders could be forced to cut prices, something they've been fighting tooth-and-nail.

Despite the recent spat of bad news, home prices continue to hold their own, and in many instances are moving higher – at least month-over-month. The FHFA home price index for June increased 0.9 percent after posting 0.4 percent and 0.3 percent increases in May and April respectively.However, does the slump in new and existing home sales portend falling home prices? We remain optimistic that prices will hold. People are understandably wary about big-ticket purchases, like a home, because of slow job growth and stagnating economic activity. But all have a reservation price (a price they will not sell below). Houses (that is, habitable houses) won't be given away, they'll be taken off market if the sales price doesn't exceed the reservation price.

Reservation prices could fall and the monthly price trend could reverse, of course. That said, we think most of the bad news is baked into the system, so we don't think there will be any heavy discounting. In short, we still think a home is a worthwhile investment in today's market.Mortgages have also been holding a price trend. Bankrate reported that its weekly survey on rates posted another all-time low. It's worth noting, though, that after the survey was released, yields on the 10-year Treasury note spiked 10 basis points, which points to higher mortgage rates in the next survey.

A surfeit of negative news has kept mortgage rates low. This has lead many analysts to opine that ultra-low mortgage rates are the new norm. We think this is a dangerous way of thinking (which we'll explain below) and that it is still best to take advantage of rates unseen in over 50 years.

Is it Déjà Vu All Over Again For Harrisburg PA Real Estate?

by Don Roth

Harrisburg PA Real Estate Market Update brought to you by Jessica Regan, GMH Mortgage:

"It's d éjà vu all over again,” or so goes one of Yogi Berra's more famous malapropisms. There is a whiff of appropriateness to it, because home prices and foreclosures are reoccurring themes.

This week, the news on home prices was mixed, but encouraging. Zillow reported that home values were up 0.4 percent for the second quarter of 2011 compared to the first, but down 6.2 percent year-over-year, with the average home valued at $171,600.

The National Association of Realtors also reported a year-over-year decline. According to the NAR, the median sales price of existing homes fell 2.8 percent to $171,900 in the second quarter compared to the same year-ago quarter. The good news is that the NAR's data show prices trending modestly higher in recent months.

The question is, will the price trend continue? Foreclosures are the elephants in the room. RealtyTrac reported that foreclosures fell 35 percent, hitting a 44-month low, in July compared to the same year-ago period. In most markets that would be good news, but not necessarily in this one; the drop is attributed to banks still working through last year's servicing fiasco. Many market watchers are expecting a surge in foreclosures that could plague housing through 2012.

If there is a foreclosure surge, it will likely be regional. RealtyTrac also reported that 73 percent of foreclosure activity has been concentrated in a few states: California, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Illinois, Nevada, Arizona, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The aggregated numbers might appear dire, but that doesn't mean that any one market is necessarily weakening.

Speaking of one market (actually, a number of smaller markets), overbuilt Florida is showing observable improvement. Existing home sales in the Sunshine State are up year-over-year. The median sales price has improved 17.3 percent, to $94,000, from the first quarter to the second. Florida has suffered home-price depreciation as much as any state, but lower prices spur demand, which helps stabilize prices. It's simple economics, and it's working.

The economics of mortgage rates are anything but simple. A few of our colleagues have been lamenting Standard & Poor's downgrade of U.S. Treasury debt, believing higher rates are on the horizon. We're not so sure. Mortgage rates are tightly tethered to 10-year Treasury-note yields. The current yield on these notes has dropped below 2.2 percent, lower than the yields in early 2009, and for the past 50 years. Investors obviously aren't concerned.

Much hoopla was made of the news that the Federal Reserve plans to hold short-term rates close to zero until 2013. But the Fed doesn't control the longer end of the market, which is influenced by the general level of economic uncertainty, credit worthiness of borrowers, time preference, and risk aversion. Sentiment and perceptions of these variables can change, and they can change on a dime, as the recent collapse of stock prices shows.

In short, we don't think mortgage rates are rising soon, but we'd be hesitant to play the rate game just to save a few extra basis points.

We've reworded Yogi Berra's quote into a question because of the volatility and hard sell-off in stocks. Could we possibly be setting ourselves up for a repeat of a decade ago? If you'll remember, many investors sold stocks in late 2000 and early 2001. A lot of that money was then funneled into real estate.

Admittedly, many people were subsequently burned by poor decisions – namely paying and borrowing too much. But as the sting of these losses subsides and stock losses accumulate, it's not outside the realm of possibility for money to cycle back into value-priced real estate. One of the overlooked benefits of real estate is that prices aren't continuously updated, so investors aren't whipsawed emotionally with real estate like they are with stocks.

This isn't to say that we expect a cascade of dollars to flow into real estate, but it's worth noting that investments compete with each. Given recent action in the stock market, the real estate market is looking quite a bit better in comparison.

In the wake of news stories that the US will face a government shutdown and default on its outstanding loans if a debt ceiling agreement isn't reached, many people may be wondering what the impact would be to the mortgage industry and closings.The last time we went through a government shutdown in 1995, it was a pain, but not a panic. If a shutdown were to occur again, mortgage expert Linda Davidson points out the following top six areas that could be impacted:

1. FHA Case Numbers: For each FHA loan, we are required to order a FHA case number. This number is generated before an appraisal can even be ordered. With a shutdown, we may not be able to order case numbers. Because of this, it is critical to let us know if there is a contract executed on any loan, so that our office can go ahead and order a case number without risking the loan being on hold during a shutdown. Note: with the new FHA guidelines, a contract must be executed before a case number can be ordered.The ability to close FHA loans is questionable, depending if HUD keeps its website running to obtain FHA case numbers and CAIVRS. During the November 1995 shutdown, case numbers could not be obtained, but this was prior to the internet and was a manual process. The shutdown in 1995 mainly caused a delay rather than a drop in FHA loan origination. But if lenders decide to stop accepting FHA applications, it could be a problem. I think we may see delays but not a complete shutdown of the FHA.

2. 4506 IRS Transcripts: Each loan requires the verification of at least one tax return by the IRS to verify the numbers that each customer presents on their tax returns. During a shutdown, this process would be delayed as the IRS wouldn't be at work to verify the transcripts.

3. Verifying Employment of a Government Employee: We are required to verify the employment of each customer. If the customer is a federal government employee, we would be unable to verify his or her employment during a shutdown.

4. FEMA: Homes in a Flood Zone: Homes that are determined to be in a flood zone would not be able to close as flood insurance could not be obtained.

5. USDA: During a shutdown, the USDA office would be closed because they have government underwriters that insure behind the lender. With a shutdown, we would see delays with all USDA loans.

6. VA: Like the FHA, the disruption is possible - but not absolute - during a shutdown. This would all depend on if they continued to allow their website to function. A disruption would cause delays in VA appraisals and the issuing of certificates of eligibility. If the website was closed during a shutdown, we would see delays in all VA loans.

Stay tuned for updates if necessary on this very important time period. And if you have any questions, please call or email today.

Displaying blog entries 31-34 of 34

Syndication

Categories

Archives